Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Bubble Wrap turns 50


Sealed Air Corp.'s iconic cushioning material celebrates 50 years of "popping up" with new ideas on Monday.

Mark Spaulding -- Converting Magazine, 1/24/2010 1:15:00 AM

Bubble Wrap® brand cushioning celebrates 50 years of "popping up" with new ideas on Monday. To honor the anniversary, converter Sealed Air Corp. has declared January 25 as Bubble Wrap Appreciation Day. It's also reportedly making a limited run of golden Bubble Wrap protective cushioning material.

No milestone such as this would be complete with a look at its illustrious history:

Who invented Bubble Wrap packaging?

The story begins in a building no bigger than a garage in Hawthorne, NJ, with two engineers, Marc Chavannes and Al Fielding. Marc and Al were trying to make a plastic wallpaper with a paper backing. Surprisingly enough, this product didn't take off. They quickly realized, however, that their invention, originally called Air Cap, could be used as a cushioning material. They founded Sealed Air Corp. in 1960, which has since grown to be a global converter of food and protective packaging materials with annual revenues of more than $4 billion.

How is Bubble Wrap packaging made?

Bubble Wrap starts as polyethylene resin, extruded into two stacked sheets of clear plastic film. One film layer is wrapped around a drum with holes punched in it. Suction is applied drawing one web of film into the holes that form the bubbles. The second film layer is then laminated over the first so that when joined, they stick together and trap the air in the bubbles.

Because air can easily leak out through the porous film, Sealed Air started using a Saran coating to seal the air in the bubbles. Eventually, a method of encapsulating an air-retention barrier in the polyethylene during the extrusion process was developed. This process is a Sealed Air trade secret.

Some funky Bubble Wrap facts:


Each year, Sealed Air makes enough Bubble Wrap to stretch from the Earth to the Moon and back (about 480,000 miles worth).
In 2009, Bubble Wrap got its own Facebook page and now has more than 2 million fans.
Some of the stranger uses people have discovered for Bubble Wrap:

• Winterize your pipes - Wrap pipes using Bubble Wrap and string or rubber bands to prevent freezing. • Drink cozy - Use tape and Bubble Wrap to make a soda-"pop" can cozy that will keep your drink colder for longer.• Athletic padding - Use it to protect knees, elbows or backsides when learning to skateboard, ski, bike or other fall-down activity. Down side - if you're a klutz, everyone within earshot will know it.

Polyair's brand of bubble Durabubble is available, please contact Smarter Packaging for more information @ smarterpackaging@gmail.com

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

G4 and Integration offering




Polyair Moving program

Trends 2010 from Trendsresearch.com



Gerald Celente is the director and founder of the Trends Research Institute and have accurately forecasted events and trends for over 30 years. His website is http://www.trendsresearch.com.

BREAKING POINT: TOP TRENDS 2010

The “Crash of 2010”

In November of 2007, we predicted the “Panic of ’08.” There was a panic. In November of 2008, we forecast the “Collapse of ’09.” In March ‘09, the global equity markets collapsed. But before they could crash all the way to the ground, a scaffold of emergency props was erected. An unparalleled array of government cash infusions, rescue packages, bailouts and incentives papered over the crisis.

Today, even as government spokesmen and the major media proclaim that the world is emerging from its near-cataclysmic recession, we predict the “Crash of 2010.” The rising equity markets, on which claims of recovery are based, are worlds away from the hard reality of the streets. Unemployment statistics tell the real story of real money that millions of real people no longer have and can’t get, regardless of rising equity markets. This is no time to be caught off guard.

Depression Uplift

As times get tougher and money gets scarcer, one of the hottest new money-making, mood-changing, influence-shaping trends of the century will soon be born. Those that see it first and follow it through will profit the most.

With unemployment, bankruptcies and foreclosures hitting record highs, the spirits of Americans are hitting record lows. People are becoming desperate to find something – anything – that will make them feel better, to do something to pick themselves up, dust themselves off, and start all over again.

We forecast that something will be “Elegance” in its many manifestations. The trend will begin with fashion — a rejection of the gangsta pants/hat-on-sideways look in favor of a move toward quality and individuality — and will spread through all the creative arts, as the need for beauty trumps the thrill of the thuggish. A strong, do-it-yourself aspect will make up for reduced discretionary income, as personal effort provides the means for affordable sophistication.

Terrorism 2010


While The Trends Research Institute can’t predict precise dates or the magnitude of terror attacks, we can be fairly certain they are on the way. As 2009 draws to a close, the “Fort Hood Gunman” is being recognized by the intelligence community as the poster boy for an alarming new terror phenomenon termed “lone-wolf, self-radicalized gunmen.” Years of war in Afghanistan and Iraq – and now Pakistan – have intensified anti-American sentiment and increased the number of individuals seeking revenge. NATO allies contributing troops to the wars will also be targeted.

Neo-Survivalism

Back in the Cold War days, survivalism meant building a bomb shelter and stocking it with enough food to outlast nuclear fallout.

In the late 1970’s, with inflation soaring, Iran raging, and gold and oil prices skyrocketing, survival meant cashing out of paper money and heading for the hills with enough ammunition and pork & beans to wait out the economic and political storms.

In 2000, the Y2K crowd – the most recent breed of survivalists – expecting computer clocks to crash, infrastructure to break down and the world to go dark, were armed and barricaded with enough food to feed an army and enough ammunition to hold one off.

In 2010, survivalism will go mainstream. Unemployed or fearing it, foreclosed or nearing it, pensions lost and savings gone … all sorts of folk who once believed in the system, having witnessed its battering, have lost their faith.

The realities of failing financial institutions, degrading infrastructure, manipulated marketplaces, soaring energy costs, widening wars, and terror consequences have created a new breed of survivalist. Motivated not by worst-case scenario fears but by do-or-die necessity, the new non-believers, unwilling to go under or live on the streets, will devise ingenious stratagems to beat the system, get off the grid (as much as possible), and stay under the radar.

Not Welcome Here


When economies boom and cheap labor is needed, immigrants are welcome. But when crises shrink the economic pie and/or waves of immigrants threaten to change the complexion of the nation, the welcome mat is pulled away.

In 2010, the anti-immigration movement, long building, will arrive and stay in the US and abroad. With the world’s population increasing by nearly a billion a decade, more people than jobs are being created. America and Europe, with their immigrant populations close to double digits, are experiencing an identity crisis. In Europe, fear and resentment of Muslims has led to huge gains for anti-immigrant political parties. In the US, with mid-term elections coming up, what to do about the “illegals” will be a hot- button issue that will top the political agenda and serve as a galvanizing force for a new party.

TB or Not TB

About two-thirds of Americans are Too Big (TB) for their own good and everyone else’s. In the wake of the national debate on health care, which has failed to focus on the enormous financial costs of obesity and overweight, 2010 will mark the outbreak of a concentrated War on Fat.

In fact, we forecast a massed revulsion for TB in all its manifestations – obesity is only the most obvious. Everything in America is TB – not just the waistlines, giant sodas, super-sized fries and ten-gallon cartons of popcorn. Houses, cars, debt loads, deficits, state budgets, the states themselves, foreign aid, military budgets, bureaucracies local, state, federal and “too big to fail” businesses – they’re all Too Big. Apart from government action, the “Shape Up” trend will provide a wide array of business opportunities.

Mothers of Invention


The ongoing shock to the economic system is rebooting “Yankee ingenuity.” Innovation and the “can do” spirit that was once a signature of the American Way of Life, but that fell prey to a bottom-line corporate mentality and Wall Street’s obsession with next quarter profits, is alive and well again.

The need to overcome the effects of reduced individual buying power will lead to the invention of a new class of product which will be a major trend of 2010 and into the future: “Technology for The Poor.” Growing with the same speed as the Internet Revolution, the trend will be recognized, explored and exploited by legions of skilled but jobless geeks, innovators and inventors. They will design and launch a new class of products and services affordable by the millions of newly downscaled Western consumers.

Not Made In China


Consumers are preparing to deliver a big “No” to unrestrained globalism. Three decades of outsourcing well-paying jobs has failed to deliver the high-standard service-sector economy promised by politicians. In the developed nations, living standards have declined as more jobs are sent abroad. Even less-developed nations such as India, Indonesia and Vietnam have filed complaints against China for unfair trade practices.

A “Buy Local/My Country First” backlash will be the first sign of what we forecast will become a massive, “circle-the-wagons” movement. As economies continue to decline and even more jobs are lost and/or sent abroad, it will be seen as politically incorrect and financially self-defeating to plunk down money to enrich multinationals at the expense of local and domestic producers.

We forecast a “Not Made in China” consumer crusade that will spread among developed nations, leading to trade wars and protectionism. While governments still give lip service to free trade, over 200 protectionist measures were put in place in 2009 alone.

Craftspeople and small manufacturers that can establish a reputation for quality products will be able to build thriving micro-brands, while marketers who can amalgamate micro-cooperatives into true local commerce organizations will carve a solid niche for themselves.

The Next Big Thing

In little more than a decade, the Internet Revolution has overthrown the traditional world of print. Unable to adapt to the digital age, august newspapers, magazines and book publishers that had thrived for centuries went under, drastically downsized in an effort to stay alive, or were forced to establish a web-only presence.

Who would have believed such “must reads” as the Chicago Tribune, San Francisco Chronicle, Minneapolis Tribune, Seattle-Post Intelligencer and The Philadelphia Inquirer would be reduced to has-beens and are-no-mores. In 2009, 15,000 newspaper journalists lost their jobs. Major magazines folded. Sales of books stagnated and profits fell, victims of cutthroat competition and inroads made by alternative publishing methods and technologies.

The next colossal casualty of the Internet Revolution will be TV/cable networks. Technological innovations already in place will enable enterprising upstarts to gouge out large chunks of market share from daytime, primetime, news and opinion-based programming.

Just as the print media was blindsided by the online assault and responded with strategies that proved counterproductive, the networks are already making moves guaranteed to weaken their franchises. Techno-guerilla warriors, producers, impresarios, entrepreneurs and investors that understand the vast markets beyond the realm of network consciousness and the possibilities opened by the new technology will not only carve out lucrative niches, but will also prove influential in effecting sociological, cultural and even political change.

These trends Celente discusses in detail in his Trends Journal.

Packaging Trends for 2010

Seven key observers identify the economy, sustainability, private branding and other developments likely to impact packaging during the coming year.

John Kalkowski, Editorial Director -- Packaging Digest, 1/1/2010 2:00:00 AM

Seven key observersIf it were easy to foretell the future, we'd all be millionaires. However, predicting what's ahead for the packaging community in 2010 is not like picking horses at the racetrack. Packaging Digest reached out to seven packaging observers to discover their informed opinions on what trends are likely to impact packaging in the coming year.


Not surprisingly, respondents unanimously mention sustainability as a major trend that will continue to affect operations in packaging. However, several foresee some new twists on the sustainability imperative in 2010.

In a sure sign that the U.S. has not fully recovered from its worst economic slump in decades, the economy is listed as another major concern for packagers. At the same time and perhaps because of the slowdown, private branding has shown impressive growth and is developing into a trend to watch. Product and food safety also are likely to impact packaging, the seven say, while offering observations on other developing topics such as consolidation, material costs, color coding, value promises, open innovation and the integration of product processing and packaging.

Economy drives many trends

Trends likely to affect packaging during 2010The current economic situation is a major driver for the trends affecting packaging, says Pat Conroy, vice chairman, consumer products, at Deloitte.


Since the start of the global recession, Conroy says, consumers, for obvious reasons, have taken a keener interest in searching for value in the products they purchase. He adds that there is evidence to suggest that these changes in buying behavior will last beyond the economic recovery. Additionally, in many industrialized countries the consumer base is undergoing a longer-term shift as the large Boomer group reaches retirement age and starts to spend less.

With many consumers believing that products simply have too much packaging, Conroy says manufacturers are downsizing and lightening the protective covering that goes around their products. “The benefits from these efforts are that many companies are realizing material savings in cost structures and increased demand from green consumers,” he adds.

Chuck Yuska, president and CEO of the Packaging Machinery and Manufacturers Institute (PMMI), says his group recently conducted focus groups with 85 senior executives from consumer product goods (CPG) comapanies.

Based on these discussions, he says trends sprouting from the recession include increased demand for refurbished or upgraded packaging machinery, surges in demand for copacking and contract-packaging operations and consumers' new-found affection for private-label products.

Just as importantly, Yuska says, lean principles are cutting across all levels of companies' operations. CPGs are cutting costs throughout their businesses, reducing labor costs through automation and technology, rigorously evaluating all expenditures, upgrading and consolidating facilities for the sake of productivity and eliminating non-core or poorly performing business lines and products.

Consolidation's competitive impact

As a result of this, Marla Donahue, president of the Flexible Packaging Association, says consolidations will continue to impact most segments of packaging with fewer packaging suppliers creating increased competition.


Despite the widespread economic weakness, Conroy says global consumer interest in sustainability has not lessened.

“Consumers are increasingly interested in their personal impact on the environment and are demanding more from manufacturers. Further, escalating disposal costs from governments are creating new demand for packaging,” she adds.

The economy is a big driver of how consumers make their choices, says Jane Chase, president of the Institute of Packaging Professionals (IOPP). Chase doesn't expect there to be a huge change in direction on sustainability, but that there will be demand for much more clarity around the messaging. “There have been some sustainability claims by companies that may be questionable, and consumers are really looking to get clarity around what is really sustainable,” she says. The need to define sustainability is growing, according to Yuska. “Consumers want to know what it means when a package is sustainable, and that means CPGs and other end users need to know, too.”

Yuska says that he expects to see more discussion about codes, standards and oversights. “Expect plenty of discussion across borders, markets and industries about who defines the sustainable shade of green,” he says. In the meantime, sustainability strategies within CPG operations will continue to emphasize reduction in energy, air and water use, as well as quality management, he says.

Harmony sought on sustainability

While sustainability considerations have become a fact of life, according to Donahue, there is an emerging strong push for coordinated and cooperative efforts in packaging sustainability. She says that the U.S. packaging industry will definitely be impacted by the work of International Organization for Standardization (ISO) to harmonize packaging sustainability, with the possibility of bringing in elements of the European Union's Packaging Directive. In addition, the CEO Forum's Global Packaging Initiative and the Walmart-supported Sustainability Index Consortium will be creating measurement tools that packaging manufacturers will have to consider. “Climate change efforts around the world will also contribute to the need to consider sustainability in packaging decisions,” Donahue says.

Sustainability is definitely here to stay, says Glenn Ventrell, director of packaging innovation and development for Sara Lee Corp. “A lot of people thought sustainability would go the way of RFID or be killed by the recession.”

Companies are understanding and increasingly using life-cycle assessments to look at the tradeoffs between rigid and flexible packaging, he says, pointing out that with flexible packaging, two pallets of materials can equal a whole truckload of rigid incoming materials. Packagers and their suppliers are making advances in manufacturing flexible packaging from renewable resources such as sugar cane, Ventrell says, and he expects that dynamic to continue.

He explains that bioplastic can't be used in every application, but if the economics pay off, it's a good alternative. Ventrell says we will see more companies investigating these alternatives and there will be some successes.

“It won't be a wholesale movement at this point. It's too new for a lot of companies,” he says. “Procurement is thinking it's too expensive. Supply chains are thinking it won't run on their lines efficiently or fast. However, companies that get out ahead of it will have a definite advantage. Mainstream companies will follow.”

Lynn Dornblaser, director, CPG Trend Insight at Mintel Intl., agrees that a major trend in sustainability will be the growing use of bioplastics such as polylactic acid (PLA), which is currently being used most often by small companies for very specific products, such as bagged salads. However, she indicates that she expects Coca-Cola's PlantBottle, which has 25 percent PLA content, will have a significant impact on the market.

“If Coke can make it work, I think that it has the potential to create a lot of change when it comes to plastic bottles,” she says, explaining that use of the bottle would allow consumers to engage in environmental responsibility without having to do anything differently.

“There are astounding numbers on how much petroleum would be saved. This would really resonate with consumers,” Dornblaser says. “If it's successful, I would assume Coca-Cola would roll it out across all their beverages, and their competitors would be forced to follow suit.”

Overall, there will be continued development in sustainability efforts, says Michael Richmond, president of Plastics & Technology Integrated Solutions (PTIS). “It will be more than incremental. It's about beginning to make some investment and think from a systems point of view to make it more than just an efficiency and productivity effort, which is then labeled as 'sustainable.'”

Private brands are growing

Shifting consumer preferences in a slow-growth economic environment will likely continue to impact retailers and CPG manufacturers and their suppliers, says Conroy. Many retailers looking to improve margins are undergoing shelf-space rationalization, seeking to keep only the products that are most in demand. Additionally, interest in private-label products continues to ramp up, he tells PD.

With the current economic downturn, Ventrell says, “We're going to see people shopping on price who didn't shop that way before.”

Consumers' frugal frame of mind will continue to encourage a hunt for value, Yuska says, with national “value products” and private-label brands as viable options. This mindset is forcing brand owners to reformulate, rebrand and reprice products to avoid competing strictly on price. It's also increasing the importance of the package as a differentiator. “While consumers are also more educated about the products they buy, they are still seeking, and positively responding to, innovations in products, packaging, advertising and branding,” he says.

Packaging enhances value

Nationally branded consumer product companies concerned about losing market share are responding to these changes by offering enhanced value to their core customer base. As part of this effort, packaging is changing, particularly in many price-sensitive categories. Some companies are redesigning packaging to more strongly differentiate their brands.

“This is a very fascinating time in the U.S., when it comes to branded versus private-label because private-label branding has never been as strong as it is right now,” says Dornblaser.

Packaging uniqueness is going to be a major differentiator for successful products, she says, adding that color coding on packaging within a product line to differentiate that packaging is another developing trend. She says a recent Mintel survey shows 64 percent of people in the U.S. say they like to see color-coded packages to help them distinguish between products. She uses Vitamin Water as an example, where every label color is for a different flavor and signifies a different functional benefit. “This simplifies the consumer shopping experience,” she says.

Open innovation requires more than just innovation, according to Richmond. He says open innovation is looking outside the company's four walls for creative ideas and thinking that gets implemented into something successful.

“Some companies have recognized the need to go outside the company for innovation,” Richmond says. “There are some 'not-invented-here' attitudes that need to go by the wayside.”

Food-safety concerns

Food safety is the number-one issue for the public and will continue to affect packaging materials, according to Donahue.

As a result, companies are seeking new packaging that helps ensure healthy and safe products, according to Conroy.

He explains that recalls can be particularly damaging to a company's bottom line so packaging that can help prevent mislabeling, spoilage, product tampering, contamination or damage will likely be in demand. RFID-enabled packaging, in the years ahead, will help improve traceability, which is particularly important to fresh produce and meat companies.

“Most companies understand that the added expense of improving packaging to help prevent recalls or a liability case is often far less than the cost of losing many customers because of an unhealthy or unsafe product,” Conroy says.

Concerns go beyond preventing product recalls. Health issues are encouraging consumers to seek out smaller portions and better-for-you versions of packaged food products. This is increasing the demand for new packaging. Ventrell points to microwave packaging innovations that tie in with healthy living and foresees more steaming and susceptor technology, which both browns and cooks foods, in microwave packaging.

Thursday, January 7, 2010

Packing the Army's guns & ammo


New Jersey laboratory tests and develops weapons packaging that leaves virtually no room for design errors.

By Joe Ogando, Contributing Editor -- Packaging Digest, January 6, 2010

At first glance, the packaging the U.S. Army uses for its guns and ammo looks a bit like it's stuck in a time warp. Even though the weaponry itself has increasingly gone high-tech, the packaging still consists mostly of steel or wood containers that look like they could have seen action in World War II.

Outward appearances, however, can be deceiving. Today's military containers aren't your grandfather's ammo boxes. The military relies on packaging designs and materials that are every bit as modern as the weapons and ammunition inside.

Much of the Army's weapons packaging falls to the engineers working for the Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center (ARDEC) at Picatinny Arsenal in Rockaway, NJ. “Our mission is to package everything designed at Picatinny, and that's about 95 percent of the military's ground firepower,” says Mike Ivankoe, supervisory packaging engineer for ARDEC. The list of “products” they package ranges from small arms to huge howitzers and all the munitions that go into those weapons.

Electronics need protection

Ivankoe says a couple of trends over the past 10 years or so have made well-designed packaging more important to the military than ever. One is the growing use of electronics, which makes weapons more effective but also more delicate and costly. For example, Ivankoe and his team have designed packaging to protect precision-guided munitions costing tens of thousands of dollars per round. There's also been an ongoing trend to make munitions safer during storage and transport.

“There's been a growing awareness over the past 10 years that packaging is a crucial part of a munitions system—not just something you strip away and leave on the battlefield,” he says.

In some ways, the design goals for military and civilian packaging don't differ all that much. “Our packaging protects against a variety of environmental threats, just like commercial packaging,” says Ivankoe. He cites resistance to temperature extremes, moisture, impact, UV radiation, electromagentic interference and vibration as a few examples. And just like their commercial counterparts, ARDEC's packaging engineers also design with cost, weight and size constraints in mind.

What sets the military apart, however, is how severe the environmental threats can be. According to Steven Sicoli, an ARDEC packaging engineer, Department of Defense specs call for the packaged weapons and munitions to withstand temperature extremes from -65 to 160 deg F as well as drop tests–up to 7 ft without damage to the product and up to 40 ft without detonation. Packaged goods are also put through vibration tests at high and low frequencies to simulate the many different transportation conditions, as goods make their way from the factory to the battlefield.

In addition, military packaging has to meet longevity standards that include a lifespan of 20 years in protected warehouse settings and more than two years under field conditions. Finally, the military assesses packaging for its ability to hold up against nuclear, biological and chemical weapons. “We have to worry about of lot of things industry doesn't worry about,” Sicoli says.

One application that highlights the difficulty in creating military packaging involves the Excalibur GPS-guided artillery round, which debuted in Iraq in 2007. Ivankoe notes that this 155-mm precision round bristles with guidance-related electronics, which add a fragility factor to an otherwise rugged munitions product. Passing the 7-ft drop test on the packaged round's nose end was particularly difficult and required many engineering hours. “Creating the Excalibur packaging was a herculean task,” he says.

Designing a 'cocoon' for shells

That task fell largely to packaging engineer Peggy Berkowitz, who came up with a foam-and-plastic “cocoon” that allowed the round, which weighs more than 150 lb when packaged, to pass all of its drop tests. Designed with input from finite element-analysis (FEA) software, the cocoon consists of 9# foam, 20# HDPE sheet and a structural plastic load spreader—all arranged with attention to the extrusion orientation of the plastics. Berkowitz says she had to shoehorn the entire structure into the 1.5-in. space between the Excalibur's nose and the interior wall of its wooden exterior container. “We had a limited amount of space, given the impact requirements,” she recalls.


Noting that the use of electronics is on the upswing in weaponry and munitions, Ivankoe predicts that more and more military packaging will require the same kind engineering approach that went into the Excalibur package. He says more and more of the packaging has to double as a Faraday cage and provide shielding against electrical fields.

Another important aspect of ARDEC's packaging mission is preventing munitions from blowing up–at least until they're supposed to blow up on the battlefield. Fire, bullets, fragments from other projectiles and various types of impact shocks can all cause unwanted detonation, and ARDEC's packaging increasingly helps mitigate these threats as part of a design approach known as “Insensitive Munitions,” or IM.

IM's stringent thermal and impact requirements dictate that the mechanical design of the munition, the selection of its energetic materials and its packaging all work together as a system. “A lot of the IM requirements cannot be met unless the munition and its packaging are designed as a system,” Ivankoe says. For that reason, ARDEC's packaging engineers serve as part of the munitions design team from the beginning of a project. “There have even been cases where munitions designers have made changes to the munitions to accommodate the packaging.”

Compliance poses challenge

Yet even with a systems design approach, IM compliance isn't easy to achieve. Sicoli notes that very few products pass the full battery of IM tests required of all new munitions. In fact, the most recent example he cites was the XM155 Spider Grenade program from 2005.

Ivankoe credits IM, which has been ramping up since the 1980s, as raising the profile of the packaging in the military. “Packaging is no longer seen as something sacrificial,” he says.

Indeed, some of ARDEC's most interesting packaging innovations are rooted in IM compliance. One case is a patented “ionmer window” that has been integrated into different types of metal munitions containers. Injection-molded from A. Schulman's Formion ionomer, the window melts at roughly 260 deg F, creating a vent in the side of the container if a fire breaks out. It's a key piece of IM packaging technology because the vented munitions burn rather than detonate.

Limiting plastics...for now

For all of the success that foams and the ionmer window have had in solving specific problems, don't expect the military to abandon its fiberboard tubes and metal boxes in favor of plastic outer containers or overpacks any time soon. These traditional container styles have had a long track record when it comes to meeting durability and cost requirements.

“So far, plastics haven't been good choice for us,” says Sicoli, explaining that low-cost thermoplastics have trouble standing up to the thermal and mechanical load requirement of the military.

Still, there have been some nearly successful attempts to create all-plastic “ammo” containers.

Ivankoe and Sicoli pointed to one recent project to create a glass-filled thermoplastic composite package for mortar shells. This “monopack” was created as a handy alternative to the current pair of fiberboard tubes in a metal overpack. “The soldiers like the composite pack in principle,” Sicoli says. And the container passed its initial gamut of impact and IM tests. The stumbling block is cost.

In the meantime, there is plenty of work to do to improve the traditional metal containers. ARDEC's packaging engineers are looking at corrosion-resistant coatings for metal ammo boxes instead of painted versions. ARDEC has also launched a way to come up with a set of interlocking containers that form a cube regardless of the containers' sizes. The new container design would replace the 18 container varieties with just six, which would cut costs. Says Ivankoe, “If we have to customize, we will. But we try not to reinvent the wheel.”


Monday, January 4, 2010

Dell introduces packaging made from bamboo

From packagingdigest.com

Dell says it's the first in PC Industry to use bamboo as alternative to other packaging.

By -- Packaging Digest, November 17, 2009

Sustainable packaging, Dell, bamboo packaging, electronics packagingDell will begin shipping its Dell Inspiron Mini 10 and Mini 10v netbooks in packaging made from bamboo, a highly renewable material that serves as a great alternative to molded paper pulp, foams and corrugate often used in packaging.

Dell is using the material for the product cushions cradling the Mini inside an outer box made from 25 percent post-consumer materials. The company plans to expand its use of bamboo packaging to more products in early 2010.

This innovation is the latest expression of Dell’s commitment to minimizing its impact on the planet and making it easy for customers to do the same.

Why Bamboo?
It grows fast. Bamboo, a member of the grass family, is among the fastest growing woody plants in the world. It can grow up to 24 inches per day and reaches full harvesting maturity in three to seven years, significantly faster than hardwoods.
It’s strong. Remarkably, bamboo’s tensile strength is similar to that of steel, making it a reliable material for protecting technology equipment in transit.

It’s easy on the environment. Bamboo helps promote healthy soil. The plant’s deep root systems protect against land erosion, and when harvested correctly, it doesn’t require replanting after harvest.

Sustainable packaging, Dell, bamboo packaging, electronics packagingEnsuring Sustainability
Dell is working with bamboo packaging supplier Unisource Global Solutions (UGS) to ensure all processes associated with the bamboo’s production meet the highest standards. The company sources its raw bamboo from a forest that follows Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) principles and criteria. The bamboo forest is located in China’s Jiangxi Province -- far away from pandas’ known habitats. Dell is also working with UGS to secure FSC-certification for the bamboo’s full chain of custody, from the forest to the manufacturing facilities.

Dell, Georgia Pacific, UGS and Environmental Packaging International are also in the process of certifying the packaging for recycling.

The Three C’s of Smarter Packaging
In December 2008, Dell announced a plan to revolutionize computer packaging. By 2012, Dell aims to reduce packaging volume by 10 percent; increase the amount of recycled content in packaging by 40 percent; and increase the amount of materials in packaging that’s curbside recyclable to 75 percent. To achieve these goals, the company is implementing a strategy based on the three C’s:

Cube: How big is the box? Could it be smaller?
Content: What is the packaging made of? Could it be made of something better?
Curb: Is it easily recycled?

"The use of bamboo for electronics packaging is pretty new, but its viability as a great packaging material can’t be ignored," said Oliver Campbell, Dell’s senior manager of packaging worldwide. "We’re introducing it with mobile products, as it’s proven a strong, sustainable and cost-effective solution for packaging those. We’re actively working to integrate this and other innovative, agricultural materials into packaging for products across our portfolio."